News:

Reminder to CLC members, please make sure that your CLC number is stored in the relevant field in your forum profile. This is important for the upcoming change to the Forums access, More information can be found at the top of the General Discussion forum. To view or edit your profile details, click on your username, at the top of any forum page. Your username only appears when you are signed in.

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
For Sale - Parts / Re: 1957? Carb, Intake, Air cl...
Last post by 59-in-pieces - Today at 02:46:35 AM
Mike,

Is this for a 4 barrel or dual quad set-up.

The air filter for the 57 dual quad is a one year only, as I recall.
It has the shorter lift tubes - approx. 1.5" -  between the carbs and the canister itself.
This is because the hood's vertical dimension was lower that year, squeezing the clearance.

I don't know about the clearance for a single 4 barrel carb, or if it was year specific too.

Have fun,
Steve B.
#2
General Discussion / Re: Wanted: CLC Escalade Owner...
Last post by 59-in-pieces - Today at 02:31:22 AM
I don't understand why there is this tug-of-war over having a new Chapter.

Frankly, unless you have a dog in the fight - you own an Escalade - why would you care.
Do you think that having a new focused Chapter would some how diminish the interest in your favored Chapter, that seems highly unlikely.

I might balk at establishing a new Chapter that focuses on Pink Cadillacs of whatever vintage.
But, I would not campaign against its formation.

My wife had her Escalade (special order harlequin paint turns green, blue, or purple) and she loved it, until some irresponsible 17 year old kid with 5 months on his license came around the corner hell bent for election and totaled her car.
His Mercedes caught fire and burned up.

I replaced her Escalade with a new one, but swallowed hard twice at the price.
But, I wanted her to be safe driving high up and surrounded by lots of steel, for todays standards - but nothing like my 47 convertible - now that's steel.

Have fun,
Steve B.
#3
For Sale - Cars / Re: 1932 Fleetwood 355-B - Pro...
Last post by dogbergs - Today at 02:04:35 AM
Hi Marc,

Just of curiosity, this would be another car than the one you had posted about in restoration corner?
Some photos would be perfect here I guess.

Regards all the way from Sweden

Johan
#4
The newest Caddy for me was my 94 Fleetwood Brougham. I never did consider it a "real" Cadillac. On the other hand, my 89 Brougham definitely was though.

I also tend to agree that the last of great traditional looking Cadillacs with that old school build quality when things were still screwed and bolted down, not with plastic clips, with nice chrome trim everywhere with little emblems and scripts was the 92 Brougham.
 
Don't like the modern new stuff at all, and I also feel like the interiors of a lot newer vehicles have poor fit n finish. I just rented a 2022 Chevy Traverse and the interior quality in that car was ungodly cheap and flimsy. Lots of loose fitted trim that can easily be flexed with a slight pull or tug with your fingers. This wasn't an issue on the vintage stuff.

Sure it was a Chevy, what do you expect, it's still a GM vehicle, and I believe the Cadillac XT6 is based on the same platform with the same raspy noisy V6 under the hood built in the same factory.
#5
In my unbiased opinion, the full sized Lincoln's of 70's and 80's do ride smoother, are quieter, they ride softer more floaty than any Cadillac I've ever driven. Plus I feel like the Lincoln's have less vibrations in its body structure.

Cadillacs, depending on the year, have a floaty nice ride as well, but they always have handled better and feel more planted to the road than most Lincoln's. Build quality also depends on the year, I've always loved the build quality of Cadillacs up until about 1966 or 68. By the 70's, their quality dropped off, but improved by 1977.

Cadillacs are more unique and use Cadillac only parts, while Lincoln's shared a lot of their components with Fords especially starting in the 70's. The 60's suicide door Continentals are wonderful cars.

Both are great brands.
#6
General Discussion / Re: Wire Harness
Last post by The Tassie Devil(le) - Today at 12:31:58 AM
If I didn't know any better, I would have thought it is for the external Voltage Regulator when using an earlier Alternator, that requires an external Voltage Regulator.

Are there any "vacant holes" in the inner fender opposite the Alternator where a Voltage Regulator could have been?

Bruce. >:D
#7
General Discussion / Re: Road trip!
Last post by The Tassie Devil(le) - Today at 12:28:55 AM
G'day Geoff,

Nothing like a driving rally, and half the fun is getting there, no matter how far away it is.

Bruce. >:D
#8
General Discussion / Wire Harness
Last post by ELDERDADO - Yesterday at 11:57:33 PM
Can any one tell me what this receptacle is for? (located behind carb) And why my mechanic felt the need to connect it to my alternator? What else goes into the other contacts? I believe it goes through the firewall.
#9
Technical / Authenticity / Re: Squeaking belts on '61 Dev...
Last post by TJ Hopland - Yesterday at 11:27:43 PM
I have found that modern automotive V belts for some reason take 2 or 3 re tensions over a few hundred miles before the seem to settle in and stay where you set them.  Industrial or lawn and garden belts don't seem to do that.  Dunno why.
#10
General Discussion / Re: Clicking Sound Dashboard
Last post by TJ Hopland - Yesterday at 11:22:47 PM
I have had mine rigged up for a while but I seem to recall if you turn the dial all the way down to 60 and put the mode to vent that will reduce the clicking. 

Mine has a bad transducer and amplifier and during the testing I discovered a workaround.  There is a vacuum servo down in the programmer which is the control box down on the ductwork on the passenger side.  If you disconnect and plug the vacuum line feeding that and connect a hand vacuum pump/gauge you can manually control the temp and blower speed. 

Here is Tim's site.  Kinda old school but his contact info is there.
https://cadillactim.com/#manuals