My only Cadillac ownership experience has been with a 1950 series 62 Convertible, which I regret that I sold many years ago. I now find myself interested in late Pre-war models, specifically the 1940-1942 models. What do collectors think of theses years? Is there something special about the 1941, 60S? Are there certain options that increase or decrease values, such as Hydramatic?
What are the common weaknesses I should look for other than general condition?
Any responses are appreciated, thanks, --Tom
if you would like to reply direct instead of posting, please do so. tmartinez@martinezandturek.com
The '41 60S is considered to be one of the best automotive designs in history - on par with the first generation Lincoln Continental.
Personally, it is one of only two 4 door models I would consider buying in the future. It is a truly beautiful design.
Here's a snippet from Roy Schneider's Cadillacs of the Forties about the '41 60S. Hope you can read the text.
Collectors? Couldn't say. I can't afford to collect cars, just appreciate them. The late 30's through the late 40's Cadillacs and LaSalles are, in my opinion, the some of the nicest cars around. They are simple yet refined; elegant yet reliable. Moving from the late 30's into the early 40's the cars kept the same level of refinement but became more streamlined and sleek looking. I have heard many say that the 41 is one of the nicest looking cars ever. I have my 38 that I inherited, but if I were to look for a car to buy it would probably be a 41, 48 or 49 convertible. I think most discount 42 and 46 because they are the bookend years of the war.
The 60 Special is amazing when you consider Mr Mitchell was only 25 when he designed it . I certainly feel lucky to own one, but after being parked next to Gary Johnsons 41 Convt Coupe at the Grand National this year, I came to appreciate the beauty of the the 62 series converts,to me both styles are timeless Marty