Cadillac & LaSalle Club Discussion Forum

Cadillac & LaSalle Club Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: 60eldo on June 06, 2025, 06:05:19 PM

Title: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: 60eldo on June 06, 2025, 06:05:19 PM
Can anyone tell me if a 1962 transmission will fit in a 60, and would they be the same or will I have to do some modifications.
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: Clewisiii on June 06, 2025, 07:04:03 PM
I think the trans mount is different. But I am not sure if the cross member is different.
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: Bob Hoffmann CLC#96 on June 06, 2025, 07:38:46 PM
See what a Hollanders Interchange Manual says.
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: The Tassie Devil(le) on June 07, 2025, 12:06:42 AM
The Starter Motor mounts are different, as is the Block Plate that locates the Starter.

The reason for this is that the '62, like the '61, runs a shallower pan, because the chassis sits lower to the ground.

Bruce. >:D
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: Warren Rauch #4286 on June 07, 2025, 07:58:13 AM

   Hollander (1969 edition)
  #363  w/conv. and flywheel,less oil cooler
       
     8619989  (C62&c63) exc 75&CC
     8619975   CA-62    75 &CC
     8619990  CA-63    75&CC
     8619996  C-64
     8619997  CA-64
      Cadillac 62-63
      Cadillac 64 all models w/Hydra Trans (NOT turbo)

Note: 365 & 366 fit to block and crankshaft & have same ext. hsg & output shaft,but case is different

   #364  w/flywheel  Hsg and converter,but less oil cooler

     8618975  C59 all exc 75 &CC
     8618976  CA 59  75&CC

    59 Cadillac

  Note: #365 fits


    #365  W/flywheel Hsg. and converter ,But less oil Cooler

    8619912   C60 all  exc 75 &CC
    8619913   CA 60   75&CC

    Note#1 see note under #363
    Note #2  #364 fits

   #366  W/flywheel Hsg and converter,but less oil Cooler

    8619963  C61 all exc 75& CC
    8619964  CA61  75 & CC
   Cadillac 61 all

     note see note under #363

I think under #363 it should read Flywheel Housing, not flywheel,and ext. means extension  ,not exterior. Its not a direct fit,BUT......

Warren
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: 60eldo on June 07, 2025, 10:35:00 AM
Sorry dont understand hollander stuff. Basicly ,will it bolt right in or do I need to make changes to bellhousing, linkages, starter I know is smaller.
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: The Tassie Devil(le) on June 07, 2025, 09:15:02 PM
Jon,

All I can add is that the 1961 engine, which is the same as the 1962, will fit to the 1960 Transmission, as that is what I had in my own '60 CDV.

The problem I had was that the Starter Motor and Block Plate had to match the Transmission.

As for the gear linkage and Kickdown, in my case, I had to construct my own linkage, as my car was RHD, but the Kickdown was the same, but, as I was running a Holley 750, Vac Secondary, I had to make my own bracket for the carby to replicate the one for the Carter WCFB, which I didn't have.

The first picture is an original, and the second one is what I replicated for a WCFB, but the last picture is what I made to fit the Holley.   Bearing in mind that I was also using a throttle cable, but it worked.   The reason why I didn't use the WCFB was because it was no good, so I reverted to the Holley that I had previously had on the 454 which I took out.

Bruce. >:D
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: 60eldo on June 07, 2025, 09:56:25 PM
Bruce all due respect to you. I want to know if a 1962 transmission will bolt up to a 1960 engine. Or, will I need to do modifications.
Title: Re: 1962 trans in a 60
Post by: The Tassie Devil(le) on June 08, 2025, 12:20:46 AM
The answer is YES.

But, you have to use the correct Starter Motor, and Block plate to fit the Starter Motor so that the engine will start.

The Drive Plate is the same for both units, as is the small disc in the end of the crankshaft.

Cannot get much clearer than that.

Bruce. >:D