News:

Please note that, while reinstating users, I have noticed that a significant majority have not yet entered a Security (Secret) Question & Answer in their forum profile. This is necessary for a self-service (quick) password reset, if needed in the future. Please add the Q&A in your profile as soon as possible

Main Menu

1955 Series 62 Front Shocks

Started by kadillackid, October 24, 2024, 01:41:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kadillackid

Has anyone had luck finding correct fit name brand front shocks for the 1955 coupes? With the help of tech support at Gabriel, they identified GA81744 as the closest fit.

My research indicates that the 1955 design does not interchange with 1954 or 1956.

BTW, I had no problem locating correct shocks for the rear.

dn010

-----Dan B.
'57 Cadillac Sedan Deville 6239DX
'81 DMC DeLorean

Cadman-iac

#2
  Kadkid,

I have both a 55 and a 56, and the only difference between them is how the shock mounts to the lower control arm. The 55 uses a bracket that the shock mounts to, then it's bolted to the arm.
In 56, the shock is bolted directly to the arm. I no longer have the 55 shocks to look at, as it was just a parts car, but I've looked at both very carefully as I was considering a disc brake kit. They didn't list one for 56, just 55 and back, and 57 and up and I wanted to know why. That is the only thing I can find, well other than the obvious master cylinder/booster location.
In fact, I'm using 55 suspension currently to hold up the 56 while I was refurbishing the suspension for it.

Hope this helps.

Rick
CLC# 32373
1956 Coupe Deville A/C car "Norma Jean"

 Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.

 Remember,  no matter where you go, there you are.

Lexi

Rick is correct. See the attached image below. Clay/Lexi

Cadman-iac

  If memory serves, the bottom of the shock on the 56 has the same dimensions as the original bracket on the 55, so if you wanted to you can delete the bracket and use the newer shock and bolt it directly to the lower arm.
 I think the designers were trying to save money by using a reusable bracket on the bottom of the shocks, instead of having to pay for a new one with each replacement shock.
 From what I remember about that bracket, it didn't look strong enough to last. The elements would have been hard on them, causing the shocks to break free eventually from the stress on them.
 It also required the mechanic to remove an additional bolt to replace the shock. With the newer design, there are only 2 bolts on the bottom instead of 3.

 Thanks for the illustrations Clay, very helpful.


 Rick
CLC# 32373
1956 Coupe Deville A/C car "Norma Jean"

 Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.

 Remember,  no matter where you go, there you are.