News:

The changes to make the forums only allow posting by CLC members have been completed. If you are a CLC member and are unable to post, please send the webmaster your CLC number, forum username and the email in your forum profile for reinstatement to full posting and messaging privileges.

Main Menu

Quadrajet questions

Started by Cadman-iac, November 04, 2024, 11:30:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cadman-iac

  Has anyone ever noticed that the Quadrajet has three different lengths for the lever mounted on the primary shaft for the secondary linkage?

 During the rebuilding of a Quadrajet, I was going through my primary shafts looking for the best one when I noticed the difference in this lever between the various shafts and carburetors.
 
 What this does basically is change the point at which the secondaries begin to open in relation to the primary and the rate at which it goes from closed to fully open.
 
 A short lever, (1" C/L to C/L), causes the secondaries to begin opening when the primaries are open approximately 45%, and then it opens slowly until both are open completely.

  A long lever, (1.5" tall C/L to C/L), on the primary shaft allows the primaries to open appropriately 75% before the secondaries begin operating, which it does at a much faster pace, basically snapping open from fully closed to fully open during the last 25% of travel of the primaries.

 The other length, (1.25" C/L to C/L) of lever splits the difference between the long and the short levers, giving you a moderate opening rate for the secondaries beginning at approximately 60% of primary opening.

  Can anyone explain the advantages of having either of these opening rates for the secondary throttle plates?

 What would you gain from having the ability to open your primaries 75% before you get into the secondaries?

 On the other hand, what would you gain by having the secondaries begin to open before the primaries are even open 50%?

 Which one would work better for say towing?

 Which is better for everyday use?

 Thanks in advance for shedding some light on this.

  Rick

CLC# 32373
1956 Coupe Deville A/C car "Norma Jean"

 Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.

 Remember,  no matter where you go, there you are.

TJ Hopland

I think it depends on where the power curve is on the engine its installed on and things like the gearing and intended use.  I would not change anything unless you really want to get into it and learn how each adjustment effects something else. 
73 Eldo convert w/FiTech EFI, over 30 years of ownership and counting
Somewhat recently deceased daily drivers, 80 Eldo Diesel & 90 CDV
And other assorted stuff I keep buying for some reason

Cadman-iac

  I'm not positive yet, gotta do a bit more research, but I've noticed that the carburetors used for some big block Chevys, Olds, Buicks, Pontiacs, and Cadillacs that have the bigger primary venturis also have the longer secondary lever on the primary throttle shaft. The actual primary throttle blade size is the same for all Quadrajets, the difference is in the float bowl portion of the carburetor. The diameter of the venturi opening is larger for ones used on bigger engines.

Just speculation here, but I think because of the bigger primary venturi, the primary throttle can be opened farther and still be able to supply the engine with enough air before the secondaries begin operating, and once they do, they engage quickly if you continue to apply more throttle.
And because of the larger displacement, the secondaries opening quickly doesn't cause a stumble or hesitation.

These seem to be carbs from the mid 70's through the 80's from the numbers I've been able to look up so far. These are all carburetors that I've been collecting for decades.

I don't know for sure if my theory applies to all large displacement engines, and I'm curious to know how a carb with the longer lever would perform on a smaller displacement engine, something  around a 350 or smaller.

I have multiple books on Quadrajets and they go into great detail on how to tune one and explain the various designs over the years, but none of them have once mentioned this difference in the lever length and what effect it has on the carburetor and engine.

If I hadn't been building one from all the parts I've got and looking for the best pieces, I wouldn't have ever noticed the difference. There is a reason why the factory did it, and I want to know why.

Anyone have any experience with this, or an idea as to the specific effects this lever length change makes in the performance of the carb/engine?

I'm thinking the 425 from 77 to 79 would be a good example, or a 402, 427, or 454 Chevrolet, or 455 Olds, 430, 455 Buick, or 400, 421, 428, or 455 Pontiac from the same time frame.

 Your thoughts are much appreciated.

 Rick
CLC# 32373
1956 Coupe Deville A/C car "Norma Jean"

 Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.

 Remember,  no matter where you go, there you are.

klinebau

I am not sure that it really matters.  Don't forget that the airhorn has to open for the secondaries to come online.
1970 Cadillac Deville Convertible
Detroit, MI